Interview with Filmmaker Fuzhi Zhao (FEET DON’T FAIL ME NOW)


Feet Don’t Fail Me Now, 7min., USA
Directed by Fuzhi Zhao
The sun will erase your memory. If you don’t want to become nobody, you have to keep running.

Get to know the filmmaker:

1. What motivated you to make this film?

Part of this idea stemmed from the fear of the unknown, which is deeply embedded in human nature. We are scared of what we don’t know. The universe is so vast that it might not have a limit, and the ocean is so expansive that we only know a tiny portion of it, and nobody can tell you what death is like. There are countless things in the world that work this way.
Just like us, my protagonist Noe can’t stop running away from “the Sun,” something that everybody on the planet fears because it will erase your memory quicker than death. Noe embraces the experience at the end, because she is small and the universe has more power over her. She can never outrun her fate. With acceptance comes peace and new experiences; she has never seen anything quite as strange and beautiful as “the Sun.”

Noe believes “the Sun” will be the end of everything for her. Is it actually true? The other half of the story is also my feelings about these “learned truths,” the things we are told to do or not to do, and if these “truths” serve a function. Noe’s stopping to look at “the Sun” is also her act of defiance.

2. From the idea to the finished product, how long did it take for you to make this film?

I’ve had this idea for a few years. After revisiting this concept, it took me about three months, from the first draft to the edits, to make this film.

3. How would you describe your film in two words!?

Dystopian haiku?

4. What was the biggest obstacle you faced in completing this film?

Everything felt kinda stressful at the time, but now I think about it, it’s really not that bad. I guess one thing is communication. Coming from an animation background, I didn’t have much experience collaborating with a bunch of people. Talking to people about what’s in my head is still something I am practicing.

5. There are 5 stages of the filmmaking process: Development. Pre-Production. Production. Post-Production. Distribution.

What is your favorite stage of the filmmaking process?

I love development because that’s where I can get crazy with my ideas, I can write stories and see them in my head, and then I wish other people could see it as I do. And then there is production, where I get to see the story slowly coming alive. It’s also chaotic in a way that requires you to come up with a solution on the spot when you have a problem, and I find some of the interesting things I’ve done are like that.

6. When did you realize that you wanted to make films?

I’ve always been into drawings, and at some point in high school, I thought that it’d be cool if the drawings moved. And then I realized that behind the scenes of movies is not at all what we see as the audience. And that I can construct different realities than the one I know.

7. What film have you seen the most times in your life?

Her by Spike Jonze

8. In a perfect world: Who would you like to work with/collaborate with on a film?

Yuasa Masaaki

9. You submitted to the festival via FilmFreeway. How has your experiences been working on the festival platform site?

The festival platform site is easy to navigate.

10. What is next for you? A new film?

I’m working on a new project right now. It’s a retro-futuristic sci-fi about a scientist named Tommy trying to fix his ill Mother, who despises him.

Interview with Filmmaker Max Neace (SHIFT)

1. What motivated you to make this film? – I had produced a few features prior to this, and figured it was time to try my hand at directing one of them. I knew it would be low budget—lower than most projects I had produced up to that point—so wanted to think of something contained and unique. SHIFT was born pretty quickly into that process: one room, security monitors, a potential murder. The rest of the world was colored in after that simple premise rose to the top.

2. From the idea to the finished product, how long did it take for you to make this film? – It took about two and half years. From script to screen, only about a year, but post we took our time. I think more independent films should take their time in post-production. Almost no one is really asking for it, so there’s no pressure to rush the film except for the pressure you put on yourself.

3. How would you describe your film in two words!? Hitchcock In-Skinny-Jeans.

4. What was the biggest obstacle you faced in completing this film? – The security monitors! Everything on the monitors is practical—we used no screen replacement or VFX to create the effect. We shot the movie twice: silently with the monitors, cut those scenes together, and then played them back live in the room for the actors to react to on set. It was a real song and dance of piecing those together well enough to sell the action when actors leave the room and appear on the monitors. It works really well, almost too well, because no one asks about them and assume it’s really happening. But that was not the case!

5. There are 5 stages of the filmmaking process: Development. Pre-Production. Production. Post-Production. Distribution. What is your favorite stage of the filmmaking process? Post-Production. Everything up until that point is just potential. It’s when you really start to craft the film in post-production that get to write it one last time and adjust your story.

6. When did you realize that you wanted to make films? – Grade school. My parents took me to the movies to keep me quiet, I think, and from there I always wanted to learn how to make my own. And am now doing so.

7. What film have you seen the most times in your life? Starship Troopers and Little Shop of Horrors (1986)

8. In a perfect world: Who would you like to work with/collaborate with on a film? – Martin McDonagh.

9. Besides movie-making, what else are you passionate about? Reading and Magic: the Gathering.

10. What is your favorite meal? – Mexican.

11. What is next for you? A new film? – I’m primarily producing these days, with the occasional short thrown in. Directing another feature will manifest sometime in the future, but right now producing is where I’m focused.

Short Film Review: Q 1. Directed by Silvano Perozic

Moving mandala what I started with a simple circle . I was interested what are the possibilites of such simple basic programme as Windows paint . First picture I named Q by case ,subconsciously or * upconsciously* ,later found in literature that Q is letter Qof in Jewish alphabet ,represent the Sun ,number 19 in Tarot .

http://www.silvano.hr/

Review by Parker Jesse Chase:

What begins as a single yellow dot at the center of the frame slowly expands into a living mandala, growing piece by piece through color, symmetry, and repetition.


The film leans into asking what can be made from simplicity, and answering by building shapes and colors into movement. Yellow gives way to green, then to hot pink and purple, each color introduced as a new layer of thought. Shapes begin to stack, forming patterns that feel less like a kaleidoscope and more like a system building itself in real time.

The title Q carries a quiet weight. Echoing the letter “Qof” from the Hebrew alphabet, often tied to the sun and symbolic cycles. That connection reframes the piece, turning the mandala into something more than visual play. It becomes a kind of orbit, a slow meditation on repetition, energy, and transformation.

The electronic synth score grounds the experience in a distinctly 90s digital texture, matching the raw, Microsoft Paint-based aesthetic. It feels nostalgic without being ironic, embracing the visual language of early desktop art.

As the mandala evolves, it doesn’t just expand, it shifts. Mandalas open like doors, giving way to new configurations, new centers. Nothing stays fixed for long. Even the structure itself feels temporary, always on the verge of becoming something else. The final transition into a full red screen, pierced by a forming yellow beam, lands like both an ending and a reset, a return to origin with the memory of everything that came before.

Q 1 is a hypnotic synth in creation. It watches something come into being, not all at once, but gradually over time. Where color and shape carry meaning without ever needing to explain it.

Short Film Review: When Fighting Monsters. Directed by Sherill Quinn

A seasoned detective struggles to make sense of his daughter’s untimely death.

Project Links

Review by Julie C. Sheppard:

At the outset of this gripping short, When Fighting Monsters, there is an astute onscreen quote of warning by Nietzsche – – to paraphrase, when attempts are made to fight evil, unjust deeds, you must to be careful that the darkness of revenge does not take you over, so much so that you are eventually just as corrupt as the original perpetrators. The actor playing the central figure convincingly portrays a character who falls into this dangerous psychological trap.

The screenplay makes use of pointed dialogue between characters where subtext is king. What is left unsaid is even more powerful than what is said, as the story unfolds. The main character attempts to control the narrative of innocence, but things start to close in on him.

Much of the film is engulfed in darkness, both physically and psychologically, with disconcerting nighttime scenes and emotional moments riddled by bitterness and anger. Swirling, eerie music and rhythms frame the highly dramatic moments. The warning off the top is prophetic, as revenge and madness come together with tragic results.

Short Film Review: DELUSION. Directed by Kenneth Christopher Muller

After her cell phone is stolen, Laura, a pregnant dentist, commits a desperate act: she attacks a stranger, convinced he’s the thief. But what seemed like a passing impulse opens a rift in her perception of reality. The cell phone reappears. The messages don’t stop. The images show impossible things.

Review by Parker Jesse Chase:

Delusion opens with the sound of a lighter flicking open and closed. No context is given, but anxiety builds. This directorial choice sets the tone before any visual or narrative is shared. When we finally see Mauricio, lit by a harsh red glow, it frames him in ambiguity. Is he a threat, or just a man caught in the wrong moment? The film never gives us a clean answer, and this uncertainty fuels everything that follows.


As the film continues to follow Laura, a pregnant woman whose phone is stolen on a dark roadside. What should be a moment of inconvenience turns into something far more dangerous. She locks onto a stranger, Mauricio, and decides he is the one who took it. That decision becomes the film’s core fracture point. From there, reality begins to slip.


Lighting plays a major role in the psychological shifts at play. The early warm tones of the gas station give way to sickly greens, reds, and yellows by the time we reach outside the bar. The world starts to feel contaminated, like reality itself is turning against Laura. It’s not just a visual queue, it mirrors her internal state.


This is a story about perception under pressure. About how fear, isolation, and vulnerability can lead to abrupt decision making. Laura’s pregnancy adds weight to every choice she makes. Her body is not just her own, and that amplifies the urgency, the protectiveness, the paranoia. When she says, “I’m not going to let them take anything else,” it lands as both maternal instinct and a
warning sign. Protection turns into projection.


Sound design carries much of the emotional weight. The escalating notifications, the persistent ringing, the layering of a heartbeat tied to her pregnancy, all build a sense of pressure that never releases.


Delusion is defined by its refusal to bend, even when confronted with its very truth. Laura embodies this. There is no real evidence that leads to Mauricio taking her phone in the first place, yet she builds a case in her mind and acts on it. The stabbing is not just violence, this is conviction made physical. Once Laura crosses this line, the film refuses to let her step back. The phone returns to her hand. Messages flood in. Images appear that should not exist. It becomes less of an object and more of a force. Something invasive. Something that cannot be discarded.


The phone reads like a stand-in for our relationship with constant connection. It doesn’t just demand attention, it traps it. Laura tries to throw it away, destroy it, escape it, but it always returns to her hand. That loop mirrors the way we engage with our own devices. The need to check, respond, stay plugged in. Even when it harms us.


Then the film sharpens its edge. Laura receives a video of herself committing the crime. She is being watched. Not just observed, but consumed. A message comes through: she is being live-streamed. People are watching her unravel in real time.


That’s where the film lands its most unsettling idea. Suffering turned into entertainment. We scroll through pain every day. We watch breakdowns, violence, and public shame. There is a distance that makes it easy. Delusion collapses this distance. It puts Laura inside that loop, turning her fear into content. The audience within the film becomes a reflection of us outside it. The performances ground the film. Laura’s unraveling feels physical. Her hands shaking, her breath tightening, the way panic lives in her body. Mauricio, in contrast, is quiet and human, which makes the violence against him hit harder. He feels like someone who could have walked away from the story entirely, if not for her belief.


The final image, a wide pullback revealing her bloodied and alone, lands with a kind of cold distance. It echoes the earlier surveillance shots. We are no longer close to her. We are watching, just like everyone else.

Feature Film Review: CUBA COOCUYO REMIX

In a nocturnal Cuba, lit only by the tiny lights of the cocuyos, the island’s DJs and electronic music producers become a living metaphor: like those glowing insects, they come alive at night, illuminating the city with their energy and restlessness.

Project Links

Directed by Desiderio Sanzi

Review by Julie C. Sheppard:

This film, Cuba Coocuyo Remix, is a solid tribute to the electronic music coming from nighttime venues of this colourful, historic island. The film captures the rhythm of the language, and the sites and sounds of the place – – the cinematographer does a fabulous job including scenes of people of all ages and walks of life going about their days. 

Despite the obvious challenges of living in Cuba with its old cars and rather crumbling infrastructure, the DJs are not at all deterred when making plans to create lively, upbeat musical entertainment. The refrains of music we do hear give us a strong clue to what the high energy events of the night will bring. It is also inspirational to hear the thoughts, plans and dreams of a local DJ, and a confident voice discussing the available equipment and software.

The comfortable interactions between city folk give the pace of the film a gentleness, as time almost seems to stand still as we wait for the evening to come and the music and dancing to begin. Film viewers no doubt wish they could join in this electrifying dance.

Short Film Review: WHAT GOES UP. Directed by Graham Birch

At times, being bipolar can be an all-consuming challenge, requiring a lot of stamina and even more courage but when a young girl, Ava, decides to rid herself of her medication, thinking her own strength and will power can fix the chemical imbalance in her brain, it just leads to a recipe for disaster. When Ava finds love on this chaotic path, was it all she needed? Or will things take a turn for the worst.

Home

Review by Victoria Angelique

It is rare that a narrative film like WHAT GOES UP delves deeply into the choices a person with bipolar disorder makes, particularly when it comes to medication. Ava does what many people that suffer from mental health disorders do, she chooses to stop her medication on her own because she feels better and decides that she no longer needs the daily regimen without consulting a doctor. This has catastrophic effects as the days pass by, with the ominous score foreshadowing the coming events that are about to unfold in Ava’s life. 

The people in Ava’s life mirror those in real life situations when it comes to mental health. Her lifelong friend implores her boyfriend to tread carefully, which indicates that she knows how Ava will react to certain words. It’s only when Ava goes too far, trying to force her into playing a dangerous game that her friend also tries to force Ava to get help. The only calm force, in Ava’s current manic state of mind, is her new boyfriend Jesse. He treads carefully, even saving her life as she feels betrayed by her friends and wants desperately to die. 

Ava’s decision to stop the medication sent her into a manic state. Jesse is written to be a modern prince charming as the man that steps up to save her and stand by her side, when he could have ran since he just met her at the coffee shop he worked that month. There was an instant bond, so he stayed strong and even as she descended into her manic state, he chose not to leave. 

Mental health is a stigma that many people don’t talk about, much less depicted in film. It’s hard to explain the state of mind that a person goes through when medication is stopped, but WHAT GOES UP did it perfectly.

Short Film Review: ANOTHER STAR. Directed by Antonia Stevenson

Another Star is set in 1970s Washington, D.C., where young Black girls begin vanishing from neighborhood streets, their disappearances met with silence, suspicion, and systemic neglect. When one girl fails to return home from a simple trip to the corner store, her family’s growing panic exposes a community long accustomed to being unheard.

Project Links

Review by Julie C. Sheppard:

Another Star is a vivid and suspenseful retelling of the heartbreaking true story of targeted murders of young black girls in Washington, D.C. in the early 1970s. This film captures the style of the era on so many levels: the use of a rotary dial telephone and an analog clock, bright wallpaper motifs on the set walls, wardrobe pieces with patterns such as stripes and geometric shapes, large afro hairstyles, 1970’s musical refrains emanating from the radio, and scenes of protesters picketing against the Vietnam war. Another reminder of the time is that there is no sign of any modern electronic games for the kids, but instead a simple game of Jacks for entertainment.

The film layers in archival photos of the real girls who lost their lives, which makes this dramatization even more poignant. Other effective choices are made such as muted voices during arguments and low, extreme close-ups of hurried walking feet of both the pursued and the pursuer. It also does a clever job using flashback scenes to clarify the chain of events before the murders.

A solid cast does justice to this tragic depiction of events. The committed female detective is particularly convincing and is able to sensitively draw out the grieving mother with a mind to keep other children from potential danger. These murders must have caused such terror and paranoia for this black community of the time. The project does a remarkable job elucidating this fear, and yet also reveals resilience, love and loyalty.

Short Film Review: Beowulf: The Coming of Grendel. Directed by Richard Eugene Case

In the mead-hall of Heorot, the warrior Beowulf answers King Hrothgar’s desperate call as the monstrous Grendel terrorizes the kingdom. A dark epic retelling of the ancient legend — Act One of a planned trilogy.

http://theglitchverse.com/

Review by Julie C. Sheppard:

Revenge is sweet in the animated short, Beowulf: The coming of Grendel. The Old English epic poem Beowulf as its source, this AI-generated film does a superb job creating the atmosphere of the period piece: scenes of rocky terrain by the sea, rough behaviour of raucous men feasting and drinking in front of a roaring fire in the middle of the sturdy wooden hall, and the presence of the old king in elegant robes and crown, and suitably-lined face. Grendel is terrifyingly depicted with a massive body and hideous eyes and teeth. Of course, we are not disappointed by the visuals of the handsome, muscled conquering hero.

This short makes use of impressive sound effects and music, from guttural utterances, surging orchestrals and booming percussion during combat, to wistful refrains of a medieval-style pipe as the king deliberates. Voice artists also deserve a nod here, convincingly able to portray their roles, from noble to brave to beastly. This project provides an excellent introduction to those fascinated by the epic poem Beowulf, a satisfying tale in which both revenge and justice are served.

TV Web Series Review: #FARELIFE – Season 1

#FareLife gives us a peak inside the lives of Connecticut strangers from all walks of life as they ride from place to place with everyone’s favorite FareRide driver, affectionately called “buddy”. From drag queens to estranged parents to drunk strangers, follow “buddy’s” adventures as he navigates the streets and the pitfalls of living, in this zany, touching and often times irreverent ride of a lifetime. 

Project Links

Review by Victoria Angelique:

Life can be unexpected, especially for a ride-share driver like Buddy in #FARELIFE. The story starts out like a typical narrative, Buddy is unhappy with his life and is living in his sister’s basement and decides he needs to make a change to improve his circumstances. His sister wants to help, though she has a vastly different idea of what her brother needs. Buddy wants a job to earn his own way out of her home, she wants him to find a romantic partner so that he can find someone to spend his life with to be happy. 

The solution comes with the ride-share job that Buddy’s sister teases him for taking as she sets up his dating profile before clients. She seems like she is well intentioned, though her brother isn’t so sure about the prospects he will find on an online dating platform for gay men in his area.  He is old fashioned and would rather meet someone the traditional way, in person, to form a connection. 

The unexpected happens through his first night driving clients when he meets a drag queen named Hannah. The conversation is awkward as Buddy learns the first rule of driving in this new job, learning the importance of body language. The attempt to break the ice causes Hannah to snap, resulting in a few moments of silence before she offers an apology to Buddy. The rest of the night ends up establishing rules for individuals that want to join ride-share jobs as the story goes from funny to somber. It picks back up at the end as Buddy picks up his final ride, Hannah.

Buddy’s sister might have wanted him to try online dating, but he proved that his way is what worked best for him. He met someone on the job she teased him about, a person that put a spark into his head about moving cities where even if they don’t work out, there would still be more romantic options that wouldn’t involve online dating. The film depicts that there are times that people feel like they are stuck, but in reality the door sometimes opens and a person can come in that will change someone’s life by a few simple words.