Film Review: BIGGER (USA 2017) **

Trailer

The inspirational tale of the grandfathers of fitness as we now know it, Joe and Ben Weider. Facing anti-Semitism and extreme poverty, the brothers beat all odds to build an empire and inspire future generations.

Director:

George Gallo

Originally entitled BIGGER THAN LIFE, the film has had its title changed to just BIGGER, perhaps not to be confused with the Nicholas Ray 1956 film.  The title LARGER THAN LIFE has also already been taken by the Carol Channing documentary.  BIGGER tells the story of two Canadian boys and how they shaped the fitness industry into the multibillion-dollar industry it is today.

The film unfolds in flashback as told by an elderly Joe Welder (Robert Forster) during his brother, Eddie’s funeral.

BIGGER falls into the trap of being too willing to please.  Director Gallo includes too many romantic episodes and too many incidents that have Joe ending up looking good.

Gallo’s script is so manipulative, it becomes too obvious what he is trying to do.  In one scene, Joe (Tyler Hoechlin) is trying to get his health/bodybuilding magazine financed by a big publisher who when seeing him, is coughing and smoking like a chimney.  The irony is noted.  Gallo does this a second time when Joe seeks finance from a smoking and fat banker.  Joe is supposed to be short in the emotions side.  This fact is made known in bed right after a lovemaking session where his girl, Betty (Julianne Hough) freaks out at not knowing anything about him.  Ok – the audience gets the point.  There is no need for her to go on and on nagging him with Joe maintaining his “je ne sais quoi” facial expression.  The musical score is also there to ensure the audience feels the way they are supposed to during the different scenes.

Subtlety is clearly lacking in the film.  This is not helped by Kevin Durand overacting in his role as arrival publisher, Hauk, who in desperation in one scene, punches Joe up.  The script treats Hauk as a super villain, the type found in action hero movie, so one might not blame Durand for this horrid performance.  As far as other performances go, the accent seems to be placed in terms of great importance.  Hoechlin speaks with a strong mixed Jewish accent throughout the movie and in short spurts.   Australian built actor, Calum Von Moger who plays Arnold Schwarzenegger does a solid Schwarzenegger accent.

BIGGER has a lot of solid well built and toned bodies, both male and female, for one to gawk at.

It is ironical that American actor Hoechlin plays the Canadian title role while Canadian Kevin Durand (from Thunder Bay, Ontario) plays an American.  Durand overdoes his part proving himself to be the worst actor in the movie.  It is not helped that he plays a despicable, arrogant ashore in the film.

Gallo’s film turns quite different during the last third when Joe starts sporting a ridiculous (laughable) moustache.  Once the Schwarzenegger character appears, the film turns unintentionally funny.  But surprisingly, one gets used to the Schwarzenegger character who lifts the film out of the doldrums.

BIGGER can best described as a relatively entertaining but cheesy biography of the two brothers that put bodybuilding into sports.  But Joe’s predictions have come true.  There are now gyms all over every city and solid portion of the population (myself included) now have gym memberships.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3k1BKNIV9c

Best of October 2018 Film Festival Interviews

These are festivals to look out for. Read interviews with the Festival Directors and learn more about them.

Interview with Festival Director Daryl Bates (A SHORT NIGHT)
READ Interview

Interview with Festival Director Edward Payson (an Anti-Hero Production Genre Fest)
READ Interview

Interview with Festival Director Dr. James Rowlins (Brighton Rocks Film Festival)
READ Interview

Interview with Festival Director Cato ML Ekrene (The Norwegian International Seagull Short Film Festival)
READ Interview

Interview with Festival Director Aleksander Sakowski (THE VISION FEAST)
READ Interview
.

Interview with Festival Director Sally Bloom (LONGLEAF FILM FESTIVAL)
READ Interview

Interview with Festival Director Pierre Cialdella (San Francisco LGBTQ Coming of Age Short Film Festival)
READ Interview

Interview with Festival Director Avery Cohen (Macoproject Film Festival)
READ Interview
.

Interview with Festival Director Gian Smith (The Black Film Festival of New Orleans)
READ Interview

Interview with Festival Director Gia Frino (Wollongong Film Festival)
READ Interview

Interview with Festival Director John LaBonney (DAM SHORT FILM FESTIVAL)
READ Interview

Film Review: BEAUTIFUL BOY (USA 2018) ***

Beautiful Boy Poster
Trailer

Based on the best-selling pair of memoirs from father and son David and Nic Sheff, Beautiful Boy chronicles the heartbreaking and inspiring experience of survival, relapse, and recovery in a family coping with addiction over many years.

Writers:

Luke Davies (screenplay by), Felix Van Groeningen (screenplay by) |2 more credits »

Films about addiction no matter how well made are a difficult watch.  Acclaimed films of this genre in the past, Blake Edwards’s DAYS OF WINE AND ROSES (alcoholism) and Otto Preminger’s THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN ARM (drugs) are examples.  The title of this latest opus on drug addiction supposedly crystal meth addiction, attempts to disguise the unpleasant material at hand.

Based on the bestselling pair of memoirs by father and son David and Nic Sheff, Belgium director Felix van Groeningen’s first English language film chronicles the heartbreaking and inspiring experience of survival, relapse, and recovery in a family coping with addiction over many years.  The son is the addicted one, and the father a mild user of drugs when younger goes all out to save his son from devastation.  As the story is derived from their memoirs, one can safely assume that all the events that occur in the film are true, maybe with just a little bit of dramatization.

Academy Award nominee Timothée Chalamet delivers a better performance here than in the over-rated CALL ME BY YOUR NAME.  But it is Steve Carell than achieves the acting honours.  At times, one hates his character for being too controlling and at other times, sympathize for his defeat.  It is when one never notices an actor’s performance that he is doing a phenomenal role and Carell achieves this feat proving himself apt at both comedy and drama.

Nic is indeed a beautiful child with two brothers.  Nic’s drug use grows uncontrollably.  The film traces his genuine attempt at rehabilitation, then coming clean before a relapse.  His parents (Amy Ryan plays the mother) are always there for him, though too angry and controlling (understandably) at times.  Nic comes close to death as well.  As said, it is a chore to watch the downward spiral of a drug addict.

Though film’s press kit says that the drug of addiction is meth, the film shows otherwise.  Nic is shown at various point heating up a liquid in a spoon and then injecting the solution into his veins.  Meth is just mixed with water when injected, so Nic must have progressed to crack, which is not explained to the audience.  In another scene, David, the father sniffs a line of powder as he claims he wishes to experience first hand of the drug.  Again, nothing is explained to the audience as meth is normally consumed by snorting (as David did) but more commonly by smoking it in a meth pipe (never shown) though the use of injection (which gives a faster high) is less common.

The film is well shot (the surfing segment) and there are no complaints with regards to the other departments.

BEAUTIFUL BOY premiered at TIFF together with another drug addiction film, Baldvin Z’s LET ME FALL from Iceland set in the capital of Reykjavik.  Baldvin Z draws his film on true stories and interviews with the families of addicts and is clearly the better film in terms of raw authenticity.  In this film Magnea the addict is never really keen of rehab and constantly lies to her long-suffering parents who finally gives up on her.  BEAUTIFUL BOY in comparison is American and the boy Nic genuinely wishes to come clean though the film proves this an extremely difficult task.  But BEAUTIFUL BOY proves once again the triumph the human spirit over adversities like meth addiction.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y23HyopQxEg

Cinefranco 2018 Review: LE FINALE (IN THE GAME) (France/Belgium 2018) ***

In the Game Poster
A rebellious teenager must travel the country with his sick grandpa to get to his basketball game.

Director:

Robin Sykes

The final game referred to in the film title is the FIFA 1998 World Cup in which France won.  Trouble is that this is the year 2018 and for Roland (Thierry Lhermitte) who suffers from Alzheimer’s, that game is still to be played.  The whole Verdi family is caring for Roland, the grandfather, who is affected by Alzheimer’s disease.  JB, the family teenager (Roland’s grandson) has only one goal: to go to Paris to play his basketball final.  But his parents want him to give it up and keep an eye on his grandfather as they are busy this weekend. JB decides to take him with him.  During this trip, nothing will happen as planned.  The film is better than it sounds.  It is quite funny with slid humour on the disease as well as some racists jokes throne in for good measure.  Excuse is that Roland with memory problems can make them.  The Chinese  have it the worst, but me, being Chinese still find it laugh-out loud hilarious.  Truthfully, they are quiet harmless.  A sweet segment in the film involves two Alzheimer’s patients, falling in love.

Thierry Lhermitte (DINER DE CONS, ZEBRA, RIPOUX CINTRE RIPOUX) is excellent.  This is the kind of French comedy that calls for a Hollywood remake.  But who could tell that France would win the World Cup again this year in 2018?

Trailer: http://www.allocine.fr/video/player_gen_cmedia=19577015&cfilm=257438.html

Film Review: FREE SOLO (USA 2018) ***1/2

Free Solo Poster
Trailer

Follow Alex Honnold as he becomes the first person to ever free solo climb Yosemite’s 3,000ft high El Capitan Wall. With no ropes or safety gear, he completed arguably the greatest feat in rock climbing history.

FREE SOLO is the new documentary by Chai Vasarhelyi and Jimmy Chin who wowed audiences years back with the other mountain climbing 2015 doc MERU that chronicled the first ascent of the “Shark’s Fin” route on Meru Peak in the Indian Himalayas.  Chin is himself a mountain climber who has climbed with the subject, Alex Honnold. Chin is also a close friend of Alex.

To appreciate FREE SOLO the documentary, one must understand the sport of free soloing.  

Free solo climbing, also known as Soloing, is a form of free climbing and solo climbing where the climber (or free soloist) performs alone and without using any ropes, harnesses or other protective equipment, relying entirely on his or her ability instead.  Soloists typically climb above safe heights, where a fall would always result in serious injury or death. In ordinary free climbing, safety gear is used to protect from falls, although not to assist the ascent.

FREE SOLO the doc offers an unflinching portrait of 31-year Alex Honnold as he prepares to fulfill his long-time dream to climb the face of Yosemite’s El Capitan – 3,200 feet of sheer granite – without a rope.  Less than 1% of those who climb attempt free solo.  The film explores his psyche and relationships, with interviews from Honnold, his mother, his girlfriend and fellow climbers.  

The film be best seen on the big screen due to the majestic landscape of rock, mountains and natural vegetation.  I, unfortunately viewed the film on a streaming link, but better  to have seen it this way than not at all.  Not every person can be a free solo climber but watching this doc on the big screen offers audiences the opportunity to experience the thrill the subject Alex Honnold goes through.  The director of photography credits go to Mikey Schaefer with Chin and Clair Popkin.

A funny segment of the doc (providing the audience with a break) involves Alex doing an MRI of his brain.  It is determined that he needs more stimuli than most to get himself excited.  Alex is extremely fit and has a muscled wiry physique, though is is clear he has a bit of a posture problem, which could be due to a past injury.

To make the film more human, the directors devote some screen time to Alex’s family background.  His mother is a French teacher and Alex never knew how to hug or use the word love as a kid.  Alex also speak candidly on screen as to what motivates him and to the reasons of his choice of the sport.  The film examines the relationship between Alex and his new girlfriend, she obviously deterring him from giving 100% to the sport.  And the final portion of the movie is the filming of the climb on El Capitan.

FREE SOLO gives a new meaning to the term edge-of-your-seat suspense.  The film won won the People’s Choice Award (Documentary) at TIFF 2018.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=LvOB5MYHjuk

Film Review: ALL ABOUT NINA (USA 2018) **

All About Nina Poster
Trailer

Nina Geld (Winstead) is a bracingly funny and blisteringly provocative stand-up comedian whose career is taking off, but whose personal life is a near-complete disaster. To escape a …See full summary »

Director:

Eva Vives

Writer:

Eva Vives

The film is as its title implies ALL ABOUT NINA.  The film follows Nina from the first frame even providing a voiceover by Nina throughout the movie.  The film follows the journey of the strong independent woman Nina finally being torn the fuck down.

Nina Gold (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) is an up-and-coming comedian in New York City. According to the press notes, she is supposed to be funny, smart and has worked hard to build a career for herself in the male-dominated world of stand-up.   But when it comes to romantic relationships, Nina’s life is a mess.  Random guys in bars, abusive married men (Chace Crawford), and an inability to stand up for herself finally convince Nina it’s time for a change.  The trouble is that what is written in the press notes do not come out as written on the screen.

Her routine at the start of the about how females get fucked and how men always want to fuck women might be right on today’s topical headlines, but Nina is downright annoying.  Her 5-minute or s routine is also unfunny, crude and dirty.  This results in the male standup comic that comes after her hitting on her after.  Her character is not that smart either.  One thing the director Vives does, while making Nina annoying, is to create an even more obnoxious male so that one cannot hep but take Nina’s side.  But one again, there is a turn.  Nina accepts the abuse, She accepts being hit and from a real dick lover (who happens to be a cop; an easy target) and has sex with him after, which basically make all the characters in the film detestable.  It would take a lot of effort to create a likeable film or story out of all detestable characters  This fact makes the film intriguing to see whether the director Vives, who also wrote the script is up to this dauntless task.

In the film, there is a segment in which Nina attends a new age group meeting.  When asked to share with the group, an incident one should not have seen like “I saw my father hit my mother”, Nina ditches the group.  When confronted by her new Mexican roommate, she says she wants her privacy and does not want to have others share her personal affairs, though she shares her stuff onstage as a standup comic.  It is the same way for the audience in this movie.  Director Eva similarly puts the audience in a female oriented scenario with certain do’s and don’t’s but the audience has no choice but sit through the entire movie.

Director Vives offers a way out for the self-destructive Nina.  She packs up and moves to Los Angeles, for a once in a lifetime opportunity to audition for Comedy Prime — the end all, be all of late night comedy.  After killing it in Los Angeles, she meets chill contractor  Rafe Hines (Common), who tempts the brash New Yorker into considering commitment.  Sublimating her own desire to self-destruct, Nina has to answer the question, once and for all, of whether women can indeed have it all.  Of course, the answer comes from a female so one can predict whee the film is leading.

30 minutes into the movie, Vives includes a second standup comic deliverance by Nina.  The routine is still mildly funny at best and still crude and rude and serves no purpose after the audience has seen the first routine.  This is the point at the film where one can tell there is no redemption in this unlikeable comedy – more unlikeable for males than for females.  Males – this is one movie to avoid and as for females – take your chances if you dare.

The be fair, the film contains a few brilliant moments like the segment where a gay couple argue about the sponge put at the bottom of the sink.  On the negative side, the film’s climax involving Nina’s truth sexual abuse routine is almost unwatchable.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS-BYN5FC1Q

Film Review: AMERICAN CHAOS (USA 2017) ***

American Chaos Poster
Trailer

A man searches for answers to Donald Trump’s widespread support before the 2016 presidential election.

Director:

James D. Stern

How did Trump win and Hilary lose the Presidential election?  More than half the world were initially in disbelief.  Writer/director James Stern’s documentary AMERICAN CHAOS aims to provide the answers while providing audiences with a bit of entertainment as well.

The film contains an excellent introduction sequence that sets the stage of exactly what is to be expected from the documentary –  a biased Democrat look at their sad victory of Donald J. Trump as the President of the United States.  The first images shown on screen are black and white, grainy footage of previous Presidents of the United States from Roosevelt to Kennedy to Nixon and finally to Trump.  Stern introduces himself then as a man born and obsessed into politics from the Democrats point of view and a true citizen of Chicago.  He cannot believe that Trump would win and informs the audience the purpose of the movie – to travel around the U.S. to meet and greet the Trump supporters to find the reason for their loyalty.  Coming from a Democrat, one can expect a totally biased view and perhaps occasionally sarcastic presentation of events, but to be fair to the man, he does let the supporters have their say and the documentary does offer two differing points of view.  So, for which side one would take – one can be rest assured in the words of the Gregory Peck character of the black defendant lawyer in TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, Atticus Finch, true democracy is illustrated to one who inhabits the skin of the opposition to see and feel from his (or her) point of view.

The doc is set during the six months leading up to the election. Stern’s travels took him 

from Trump’s adopted home state of Florida, to the Republican National Convention in Cleveland (where he circumvented tight security to find thousands chanting “build a wall” and “lock her up”) and back to Florida for the election.  

On the plus side of Trump reporters, one of the most convincing episodes involves Stern’s camera taking the audience to the Mexican and U.S. border where a seasoned border patrolman complains of his job of keeping illegal Mexican aliens out.  His patrol car has to cover miles and miles of border.  The seemingly ridiculous wall that Trump suggests makes sense to these people living at the border.  Americans there claim they need their weapons to be safe and are against gun control. Stern’s doc makes himself and the audience see the other point of view.

There is a big correlation between the reasons of the pro-Trump Americans and the pro-Brexit Brits, as pointed out in the film.  It is so true, as I never myself, expected the Brits to want to exit the E.U.  I spoke to the Brits in London during the Brexit and discovered that the working class that voted for it were really fed up and had enough of politicians who sat on their butts and did nothing.  They would do anything to prove these politicians wrong.  And same ca be said for the pro-Trump Americans who have their say in this doc.  They are fed up with Hilary and these people in power who expect to win and want them to be de-throned regardless of consequences.  A pastor even said on camera that God uses bad Kings as well as good Kings, and he voted Trump to be President and not his Sunday school teacher.

AMERICAN CHAOS breaks no new grounds in departments of musical score, cinematography or editing but it is still a powerful film in a quiet sort of way.

Trailer: http://www.mongrelmedia.com/index.php/filmlink?id=fb102922-2752-e811-9449-0ad9f5e1f797

Cinefranco 2018 Review: CARBONE (CARBON) (France 2017) ***

Carbone Poster
Trailer

2:11 | Trailer
Danger of losing his business, Anthony Roca, an ordinary man, develops a scam that will become the heist of the century. Overtaken by the crime, he will have to deal with betrayal, murder and settling.

Director:

Olivier Marchal

Writers:

Ali Hajdi (original idea), Olivier Marchal (adaptation) | 3 more credits »

The title of this dark thriller CARBON comes from the fact of France trying to limit carbon emissions by industrial companies.  

One such company that meets the quota belongs to the protagonist of the film, Antoine Roca (Benoît Magimel),  Unfortunately the firm is in huge debt and he cannot meet the daily cash flow.  It is a family business from his in-laws who treat him as a loser.  His father-in-law is played by no less than Gerard Depardieu who is a real meanie in the story, belittling Antoine and cutting him off from his son.  Antoine’s wife is not sympathetic either.  Faced with the threat of losing his firm, Antoine mounts a scam which will become the burglary of the century.  Entangled with gangsters, he must cope with betrayal, murder, and settling of scores.  

The selling of carbon is a bit confusing but the film still works as an entertaining thriller.  Depardieu shows his star power stealing every scene he is in.

Trailer: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6183834/videoplayer/vi859944985?ref_=tt_pv_vi_aiv_1

Film Review: VENOM (USA 2018) ***

Venom Poster
When Eddie Brock acquires the powers of a symbiote, he will have to release his alter-ego “Venom” to save his life.

Director:

Ruben Fleischer

Writers:

Jeff Pinkner (screenplay by), Scott Rosenberg(screenplay by) | 5 more credits »

Discounting SPIDER-MAN, VENOM is the first of the Sony Pictures Universe of Marvel Comics.  The filmmakers ensure that there is some brand distinction from the Warner Brothers (DEADPOOL, BATMAN vs. SUPERMAN) and Disney (THOR, IRON MAN) Marvel collaborations, so it is of no surprise that VENOM comes out like a hybrid of the existing Marvel action hero or anti-hero films.  VENOM is quite good and more to come would be welcome.

Ruben Fleischer who made ZOMBIELAND, makes a clear stamp in VENOM, which in truth is a horror story.  There is an alien parasite than inhabits the host, our hero and a nasty one at that – a shapeless gelatine blob looking like black jello gone bad.

Shot in both New York City and San Francisco, director Fleischer makes sure the audience is reminded of the filming locations.  There is a scene where the infected Eddie Brock freaks out on a cable car ride.  There is an elaborate chase involving cars and a motorcycle compete with special effects that is reminiscent of one of the best car chases in film history – Peter Yates’s BULITT.  What makes the car chases in past films stand out is their continuity.  This is missing in VENOM’s vehicle chase, but it is still pretty impressive.

Tom Hardy, the English actor who has proven his acting chops in LOCKE and LAWLESS and who has been in everything from DUNKIRK, INCEPTION to the MAD MAX reboot is a perfect choice for the antihero.  In plain clothes, he is Eddie Brock, the TV reporter  who has a hot show ‘The Eddie Brock Report’ who wants to do the right thing and expose the very bad people.  One of these bad people happens to be Drake (Riz Ahmed) of Life Enterprises who has just brought back parasites from outer space.  Drake has a weird and unbelievable (but, hey, this is a comic book film) plan of bonding human and parasite to inhabit outer planets when Earth fails.  Trouble is the humans and parasites do not match and the humans die.  But Brock makes a good fit.  Brock has a girlfriend, Annie (Michelle Williams) who help him when he is infected.

VENOM is largely harmless entertainment.  The monster does possess an enormous tongue, which the filmmakers cannot deists but use in a kissing scene.

VENOM contains lots of brilliantly executed action scenes all with pyrotechnic explosions and special effects combined.  Comic and action fans should be content.  There are also some crazy scenes, like the one Eddie, when first infected dunks himself in the lobster tank of a posh restaurant and starts munching on the raw crustaceans.  Williams and Hardy make good romantic chemistry.  Hardy is sufficiently versatile enough to pull off a crazy anti-hero performance, in fact one of his best.  Riz Ahmed, one of my favourite actors makes a sufficiently sinister villain.  Stan Lee makes his usual cameo appearance.

Audiences are advised to stay right to the end of the closing credits as there is a last surprise scene involving VENOM.

VENOM is an entertaining enough action hero movie and one should be eager for the next instalment.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Mv98Gr5pY

Film Review: BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE (USA 2018) ***1/2

Bad Times at the El Royale Poster
Trailer

Seven strangers, each with a secret to bury, meet at Lake Tahoe’s El Royale, a rundown hotel with a dark past. Over the course of one fateful night, everyone will have a last shot at redemption – before everything goes to hell.

From the music, songs and vintage cars, the film’s setting appears to be the 60’s – a time when political correctness are not in place.  This might explain the girl cat fight (for male chauvinist audiences to get off on) scene in the middle of the film – similar to the gypsy girl fight put on for the entertainment of 007 James Bond in Terence Young’s (Young a director who loves to put in cat fights in his films) FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE.

The film arrives with quite the bit of hype that anything can happen and the film is quite the mind-f***.  That said, audiences will be pleased to note that they will not be disappointed.

The film involves seven strangers, each with a secret to bury, who meet at Lake Tahoe’s El Royale of the film’s title, a rundown hotel with a dark past. Over the course of one fateful night, everyone will have a last shot at redemption – before everything goes to hell.

The film begins with an unseen stranger renting a room at El Royale.  He removes the carpet and floorboards to hide a bag of loot before being blown (shot dead) away.  The film moves forwards 6 months with the arrival of the seven strangers.

First to arrive is Father Daniel Flynn (Jeff Bridges) entering the empty hotel foyer only to be greeted by vacuum cleaner salesman Sullivan (Jone Hamm) and backup Motown singer, Darlene Sweet (Cynthia Erivo).  They are eventually greeted by the desk clerk, Miles (Lewis Pullman – yes, Bill Pullman’s son).  Later arrivals include a bad ass female, Emily (Dakota Johnson) with her even more bad ass sister (Cailee Spaeny) in tow.  Every person has a secret and no one is who he or she seems.  Father Flynn is no priest.  Sullivan is no vacuum cleaner salesman and Miles is no ordinary hotel clerk either.  One by one, the guests are done off, pretty much as in Agatha Christie’s TEN LITTLE INDIANS but with a difference.  This is a bad ass fucked up movie and be prepared to jump  out of your seats.  Not once but may times.  Director Godard, who also wrote the script ensures that there are lots of surprises around every corner.  So, be a little patient as the film has a bit of a slow start.

There are a few segments that could have been left out like the politically incorrect cat fight scene, without much change in the story.

All the actors appear to be having fun, hamming up their roles, especially THOR star Chris Hemsworth (a regular in Godard films) playing the villain, Billy Lee.

For a 60’s setting, the atmosphere is well created and believable.  All details from wardrobe, vintage cars to music are in order.

The film contains a good satisfactory ending where the deserving characters get to live and the bad ass guys get their come-uppance.  BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE should satisfy bad ass movie fans with bad ass entertainment, Tarantino/Rodriguez style.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7wzBVARwaU